Caution!

Visiting this web site requires a newer version of Netscape Communicator.

Visit Microsoft's Web site to obtain the newest version of Internet Explorer, or visit Netscape's Web site to obtain the newest version of Netscape Communicator.

Visiting this web site without first upgrading your browser may result in unreliable behavior.











About ZellNet



Home


Contact Information


Testimonials


Services


ELI-Puncher Kit


FAQ

Additional Resources



Protocols


Related Links

Interactive



Elispot Discussion


Career Corner

Newsletter



Validation project


CVC EPP announcement


Elispot plates column


Perforin Elispot


Fluorospot


Synthetic peptides


Dual Color Elispot

Workshops



Duke - Validation


Elispot Resource Group


Registration Milano


Registration Rome


Sitemap



Help

    Elispot Discussion

Zellnet Consulting, Inc.  
(201) 346-0710  

info@zellnet.com  




Elispot Discussion

Please, feel free to start discussions about the Elispot technique, methods, ideas, questions, experience etc. With your input, we would like to make this website to a special interactive place for everyone who is interested in the Elispot assay.


We apologize for not having this discussion site online for a while. Our web site was targeted by someone who placed a bad activeX link in the discussion. We are in the process of recovering as much as possible. The shown placement dates do not reflect the actual message posting. The first discussion topic was placed in 1999.


Subject GrB versus IFN-g

Date Wed Nov 14 2007 18:21
Author Kimberly Shafer-Weaver (Shafer_Weaver_K@ncifcrf.gov)

Jeff, You might want to check out our paper.

The Granzyme B ELISPOT assay: an alternative to the 51Cr-release assay for monitoring cell-mediated cytotoxicity
Kimberly Shafer-Weaver, Thomas Sayers, Susan Strobl, Eric Derby, Tracy Ulderich, Michael Baseler, Anatoli Malyguine
Journal of Translational Medicine 2003, 1:14 (29 December 2003)


It is not unusual to see differences between the number of GrB and IFN-g spots. One reason is that not all CTL that secrete GrB also secrete IFN-g. It could also be a function of your stimulant. We have found that different peptides can elicit differnt types and manitudes of response. Additionally, it seems that peptides with high binding avidity/affinity elicit a better GrB response.

reply show all Previous Next

Click here for this discussion's index













Sign In